Anaplan, Inc. (acquired by Thoma Bravo) vs Pigment SAS
This page compares Anaplan, Inc. (acquired by Thoma Bravo) and Pigment SAS head-to-head on the capabilities that matter — computed from sourced evidence, not authored prose. Comparisons exist to resolve a final, two-way decision.
How to use this page. Use this once you have narrowed to these two platforms. If you are earlier: a Buyer's Guide frames the decision, a Ranking shortlists the field, and the Executive Finance Assessment benchmarks your own organisation.
Recommended next: Close Management Buyer's Guide →
Executive summary
Across 3 independently-graded shared capabilities, Anaplan, Inc. (acquired by Thoma Bravo) leads on more of them. Every judgment on this page links to its independent source; nothing here is sponsored.
Best fit: Enterprise
Independently strongest at: Budgeting & Forecasting, Connected / xP&A Planning, Scenario & Driver Modeling
Best fit: Enterprise
Independently strongest at: Budgeting & Forecasting
Winner by scenario
Computed from each vendor's independently-graded strength on the capabilities that scenario needs, plus segment fit — not opinion.
| Your situation | Stronger pick |
|---|---|
| Best overall on the evidence | Anaplan, Inc. (acquired by Thoma Bravo) |
Decision tree
- Is your process documented and standardized? If not, the highest-impact first move is to standardize before automating — neither tool pays off on a chaotic process.
- Standardized and scaling past spreadsheets? Adopt dedicated software — for enterprise/SOX, Anaplan, Inc. (acquired by Thoma Bravo) tends to fit; for leaner mid-market, Anaplan, Inc. (acquired by Thoma Bravo).
- Match your ERP ecosystem — pick the vendor that integrates natively with your ERP (see Integrations).
This mirrors the same independent decision logic your Executive Assessment runs for your exact situation.
Capability deep dive
| Capability | Anaplan, Inc. (acquired by Thoma Bravo) | Pigment SAS |
|---|---|---|
| Budgeting & Forecasting | strong medium [fpa] "Nine-time Leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Financial Planning Software" | moderate medium [fpa] "Modern flexible planning platform with strong modelling ergonomics (G2)" |
| Connected / xP&A Planning | strong medium [fpa] "The connected-planning category leader, extending planning across finance, sales an | not independently graded |
| Scenario & Driver Modeling | strong medium [fpa] "Enterprise driver-based modelling and scenario planning at scale (Gartner MQ Leader | not independently graded |
Support is an independent editorial judgment (strong · moderate · limited) with a derived confidence band; both link to their cited sources below.
Implementation
enterprise-grade — expect a structured, services-supported rollout; integrates with 3 ERP/platforms out of the box.
enterprise-grade — expect a structured, services-supported rollout; integrates with 2 ERP/platforms out of the box.
Pricing
Custom / quote-based (contact sales)
Custom / quote-based (contact sales)
Pricing estimates are directional and not independently verified — request current pricing from each vendor. dilynx earns no fee that affects this page.
Integrations
Both integrate with: Workday
Oracle ERP CloudSAP S/4HANAWorkday
NetSuiteWorkday
AI capabilities
No AI-specific capability is independently graded for this pair yet. Both apply automation across the close; see each vendor page for their AI approach.
Best fit
Best for: Enterprise
Best for: Enterprise
Alternatives
Cube Software, Inc.Mosaic Tech, Inc.Vena Solutions, Inc.
FAQ
Sources
- G2 - Pigment (modern planning platform) G2 · peer-review-platform
- Gartner Magic Quadrant for Financial Planning Software 2025 (Anaplan a 9x Leader) Gartner · analyst-report
Get a recommendation for your exact situation.
This page compares them in general. Your Executive Assessment weighs your size, ERP, maturity and constraints — and tells you the highest-impact next move, with the same cited evidence.
Start your Executive Assessment →