Finance Transformation IntelligenceResearch Themes › Business Case & Value Realisation

Research theme · Decision & change

Business Case & Value Realisation

How do we fund the change and prove the value was real?

A permanent research theme — one of fifteen questions this pillar exists to answer
IndependentEvidence-backedReviewed Jul 2026Sources 60Methodology

Overview

Building and defending finance transformation business cases, and the measurement discipline that establishes whether the projected value actually materialised.

Themes cut across the nine finance domains. An article lives in one domain, but may speak to this theme from several — which is why this page is an index, not a home.

Research on this theme

All research →
FrameworkRead →

Build, Buy, Extend or Wait — The Decision Underneath Every Finance Technology Choice

Most finance technology decisions are framed as a choice between products. That framing has already skipped the actual decision, which is whether to buy a product at all. Four options are always available — bui…

Data, Systems & AI3 themes
PerspectiveRead →

The Cost of Finance Is the Wrong Target

Finance cost as a percentage of revenue is the most common justification for finance transformation and one of the least useful measures of it. It can be improved by doing less, it rewards deferral of investmen…

Operating Model3 themes
FrameworkRead →

Why Finance Transformation Programmes Fail — Nine Failure Modes

Finance transformation programmes rarely fail for interesting reasons. They fail in nine recognisable ways, most of which are visible months before anyone admits them, and most of which are decided before imple…

Operating Model3 themes
FrameworkRead →

The Finance Transformation Business Case — Sizing a Number You Can Defend

Finance transformation business cases fail in a specific and repeated way: they present one aggregate number, built mostly from headcount assumptions, at a confidence the evidence does not support. The number i…

Operating Model3 themes
FrameworkRead →

Where the Cash Is Trapped — A Working Capital Diagnostic for the Office of the CFO

"Reduce DSO" is an instruction, not a diagnosis. Cash gets trapped in four structurally different places, and only one of them is fixed by collections effort. Two are not finance problems at all — they originat…

Order-to-Cash3 themes
PerspectiveRead →

Should CFOs Modernise Their Finance Technology Landscape Now — Or Wait for AI-Native ERP?

Finance teams are drafting commentary and analysing variances with AI while the systems underneath still route the work through people. That gap is widely read as a reason to wait for AI-native ERP. We graded s…

Data, Systems & AI3 themes

If — and only if — technology is part of the answer here, this is the independently assessed market.

FP&AFP&A Software Buyer's GuideBest FP&A Software 2026

Related benchmarks

Benchmark Intelligence →

How performance in this area is measured, and what comparable finance organisations achieve.

Cost of FinanceFinance ProductivityTeam & OrganizationPlanning & Forecasting

Related implementation

Transformation Marketplace →

Where the answer is a partner rather than a product — the specialisms that deliver work in this area.

Finance Operating ModelShared Services & GBSFinance ModernizationFP&A TransformationAI Strategy for Finance

Related assessment

How it works →

The Executive Finance Assessment reads your organisation against the same maturity spine, decision archetypes and benchmark models used across this pillar — so what you read here and what it tells you about Business Case & Value Realisation are expressed in one vocabulary, not two.

Executive Finance Assessment

What does business case & value realisation mean for your organisation?

Research frames the question in general. The Executive Finance Assessment answers it for your finance function specifically — with your position, your highest-impact move and the evidence behind it.

Begins with a free Executive Brief — about five minutes, anonymous, no account. Full assessment €59, one-time. It complements the research; it does not replace it.